2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic characteristics and respiratory deposition of fungal fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
121
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ratios are based on particle mass as (1→3)-β-D-glucan is analyzed as pg m −3 . For number concentration, we have previously shown that the number concentration of fungal fragments was as much as 500 fold higher than that of spores (Cho et al, 2005). In field situations, the number concentration of fragments can be estimated based on the mass of (1→3)-β-D-glucan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These ratios are based on particle mass as (1→3)-β-D-glucan is analyzed as pg m −3 . For number concentration, we have previously shown that the number concentration of fungal fragments was as much as 500 fold higher than that of spores (Cho et al, 2005). In field situations, the number concentration of fragments can be estimated based on the mass of (1→3)-β-D-glucan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller-sized fungal fragments have longer lifetimes in the air compared to spores; they can be easily transported by air currents and more efficiently deposited in the alveolar region than intact spores. Based on laboratory studies on the number concentration and size distribution of fungal particles, it has been estimated that the respiratory deposition of Stachybotrys chartarum fragments in adults is 230 times higher than that of spores (Cho et al, 2005). When the respiratory deposition model was applied to infants, it was demonstrated that the deposition ratios (fragments versus spores) were 4-5 times higher than those for adults (Cho et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations