9th Aerodynamic Decelerator and Balloon Technology Conference 1986
DOI: 10.2514/6.1986-2458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic characteristics and flow round cross parachutes in steady motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already said that the wing operates more like a parachute than a conventional wing at this stage of the manoeuvre, and given its spread-eagled posture, the bird may be roughly approximated as a cross parachute (Shen and Cockrell, 1988), with the cross extending wing tip to wing tip and head to tail. The flow characteristics of cross parachutes typically involve relatively high powered jets between the parachute arms (Fig.·9), with the flow near the tips of the canopy arms remaining attached but with separation nearer the crossing point of the arms being encouraged by the jets between them.…”
Section: Table·3 Timing Of Lesser Underwing Covert Feather Deflectiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have already said that the wing operates more like a parachute than a conventional wing at this stage of the manoeuvre, and given its spread-eagled posture, the bird may be roughly approximated as a cross parachute (Shen and Cockrell, 1988), with the cross extending wing tip to wing tip and head to tail. The flow characteristics of cross parachutes typically involve relatively high powered jets between the parachute arms (Fig.·9), with the flow near the tips of the canopy arms remaining attached but with separation nearer the crossing point of the arms being encouraged by the jets between them.…”
Section: Table·3 Timing Of Lesser Underwing Covert Feather Deflectiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first eigenmode both parachute and payload oscillate into the same direction, and in the other eigenmode they oscillate in opposite directions. The dominant parameter of the complex eigenfrequency is the static stability of the parachute that depends on the parachute geometry (aspect ratio, arm ratioCockrell and Shen 14 ). The lower eigenmode has small damping over the full range of the static stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guide surface 4 parachute has good stability but complex in shape, geometry and inferior drag efficiency. Cruciform [5][6] or crosstype 7 parachute requires more suspension lines to maintain the shape and size, bringing in packing complexity and rotational possibility during operation. besides, it adds more cost and chances of line entanglements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%