2014
DOI: 10.11113/jt.v66.2478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Behavior of a Compound Wing Configuration in Ground Effect

Abstract: The aerodynamic coefficients of wing in ground effect can be affected with its design which can be the main parameter for efficiency of wing-in-ground effect craft. In this study, the aerodynamic coefficients of a compound wing were numerically determined in ground effect. The compound wing was divided into three parts with one rectangular wing in the middle and two reverse taper wings with an anhedral angle at the sides. An NACA6409 airfoil was employed as a section of wings. Three dimensional (3D) computatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a-b illustrates the drag coefficient and lift to drag ratio of the rectangular wing at ground clearance of 0.15 versus angle of attack. These Figures depict numerical and experimental simulations have similar tendency, however the numerical results had some deviations from experimental [11].…”
Section: 30 Validation Of Numerical Studysupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Figure 2a-b illustrates the drag coefficient and lift to drag ratio of the rectangular wing at ground clearance of 0.15 versus angle of attack. These Figures depict numerical and experimental simulations have similar tendency, however the numerical results had some deviations from experimental [11].…”
Section: 30 Validation Of Numerical Studysupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Figure 2a-b illustrates the aerodynamic coefficients of the compound wing for fixed ground at a ground clearance of 0.15, and shows that the numerical and experimental simulations have a similar trend; however, the numerical plot indicates some deviations from the experimental plot (Jamei et al, 2014). …”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%