2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.2717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Optimization of Rotorcraft Airfoils via a Parallel Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the turbulent boundary layer trailing edge noise, various passive airfoil noise control methods have been developed, such as trailing edge serrations [5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], trailing edge brushes [22][23][24], porous trailing edge [25][26][27][28][29][30], airfoil shape optimization [31,32], trailing edge morphing [33,34] and more recently upstream surface treatment [35][36][37]. It was shown both analytically [8][9][10][11][12] and experimentally [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] that trailing edge noise levels can be reduced by modifying the trailing edge geometry with serrations so that the flow disturbances are scattered into sound with reduced efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the turbulent boundary layer trailing edge noise, various passive airfoil noise control methods have been developed, such as trailing edge serrations [5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], trailing edge brushes [22][23][24], porous trailing edge [25][26][27][28][29][30], airfoil shape optimization [31,32], trailing edge morphing [33,34] and more recently upstream surface treatment [35][36][37]. It was shown both analytically [8][9][10][11][12] and experimentally [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] that trailing edge noise levels can be reduced by modifying the trailing edge geometry with serrations so that the flow disturbances are scattered into sound with reduced efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, brush and porous edge attachments may have practical limitations, namely the fine pores or spaces between brushes are prone to collect dirt and insects making them ineffective. Airfoil shape optimization such as modification of the thickness or the curve gradient can significantly affect the flow field around the airfoil, leading to improvement in both the aerodynamic A and aeroacoustic performance of the airfoil [31,32]. Trailing-edge morphing can also effectively reduce the airfoil trailing edge noise over a wide range of flow speeds and angles of attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the turbulent boundary layer trailing edge noise, various passive airfoil noise control methods have been developed, such as trailing edge serrations [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], trailing edge brushes [26][27][28], porous trailing edge [29][30][31][32][33], airfoil shape optimization [34,35], trailing edge morphing [36,37] and recently upstream surface treatment [38]. Sawtooth serrations appeared initially as means to reduce the exhaust noise of a jet engine [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This capability that is very desirable in solving many multimodal, multidimensional optimization problems. With the rapid development of various parallel processing systems [4,5,6,7,9,14], researchers are enabled to take up very large optimization problems and solve them in parallel [1,3,10,11]. While many traditional optimization algorithms are sequential in nature, genetic algorithm lends itself very nicely to parallelization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%