2003
DOI: 10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic and acoustical measures of speech, operatic, and broadway vocal styles in a professional female singer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissemination potential of operatic versus popular singing may also differ [29]. In addition, singers often perform facing out to large, captive audiences for several hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissemination potential of operatic versus popular singing may also differ [29]. In addition, singers often perform facing out to large, captive audiences for several hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because there is a limit in how high this resonance frequency can be raised, music theatre singers are limited in their f o range if they want to retain the dominance of 2 f o in the spectrum. Conversely, in operatic styles in the C4 to C5 range (males and females), the first and second resonances are often lowered by widening the oropharynx (Sundberg et al 1993; Stone et al 2003; Miller, 2008) to balance the harmonic energies of f o , 2 f o and 3 f o . Mixed registration at the source can also be used along with the vocal tract modifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hollien [26] points out that the SF is detectable only in male voices. Finally, Stone et al [15] reported a relationship between the frequency of the SF and some singing categories: 2.2 kHz in basses, 2.7 kHz in baritones, 2.8 kHz in tenors, and 3.2 kHz in contraltos. By contrast, our study was unable to establish any sort of relationship between the SF and the voice emission of our singers, for none of them, not even the most experienced, was able to produce a noticeable SF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, up to now, no standardized criteria have yet been formulated for the evaluation of the normal singing voice. One reason for the absence of formal criteria is that there are many different voice evaluation techniques, many of which are not always applicable in the same way to all styles and repertoires [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The European Laryngological Society and the Italian Phoniatric Society have both suggested a multiparametric voice evaluation protocol which should include strobovideolaryngoscopy, spectrography with the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP), perceptual evaluation with the GRBAS scale, and the patient's subjective voice perception with the Voice Handicap Index questionnaire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%