2022
DOI: 10.5937/fme2201369g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic analysis of an AK-47 bullet moving at mach 2.0 in close proximity to the ground

Abstract: The bullet is shot near the wall or the ground during urban warfare. This nearness leads to a pressure distribution on the bullet's entire body, which is asymmetric. For every case of difference in the height of the ground/wall proximity, the shock reflection angle changes, and a particular shock wave's effect on the bullet varies. In the present study, the flowfield around a 7.82-mm bullet of an AK-47 Rifle moving at a supersonic speed of Mach 2 near the ground is studied using Computational Fluid Dynamics. C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive correlation was found between the drag coefficient, the presence of a detached shock wave, and an increase in the radius of the shell nose. Gholap et al [4] studied the impact of wall proximity on an AK 47 bullet moving at Ma=2, analyzing how the heights influenced the flowfield, pressure distributions, aerodynamic coefficients, and wake region. They found that when the bullet was close to the wall, flow separation was minimal, limiting the formation of the bow shock wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive correlation was found between the drag coefficient, the presence of a detached shock wave, and an increase in the radius of the shell nose. Gholap et al [4] studied the impact of wall proximity on an AK 47 bullet moving at Ma=2, analyzing how the heights influenced the flowfield, pressure distributions, aerodynamic coefficients, and wake region. They found that when the bullet was close to the wall, flow separation was minimal, limiting the formation of the bow shock wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%