2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.a33682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodecelerator Performance of Flare-Type Membrane Inflatable Vehicle in Suborbital Reentry

Abstract: A flight experiment of an inflatable reentry vehicle, equipped with a thin-membrane aeroshell deployed by an inflatable torus structure, was performed using a JAXA S-310-41 sounding rocket. The drag coefficient history was evaluated by analyzing the acceleration of the vehicle with atmospheric density and temperature using a global reference atmospheric model. The vehicle successfully demonstrated deceleration. During the reentry flight, the position, velocity, and acceleration of the vehicle were obtained by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulence in the wake is enhanced for a larger scale model case and leads to high pressure behind the test model. This is also confirmed in the CFD results for the SMAAC flight test [25].…”
Section: Wake Structuresupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Turbulence in the wake is enhanced for a larger scale model case and leads to high pressure behind the test model. This is also confirmed in the CFD results for the SMAAC flight test [25].…”
Section: Wake Structuresupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, membrane deformation was not considered in this study. The effects on deformation were minor for aerodynamic deceleration, as reported by Takahashi et al 37 However, deformation possibly had a significant effect on the pitching moment behavior owing to formation change. In particular, as the computed results indicated, deformation could become important for the phase delay of front pressure.…”
Section: H Instability Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Thus far, various aerodynamic studies have been conducted on SMAAC. Ha et al (Ha et al, 2014a) and Takahashi et al (Takahashi et al, 2017) investigated aerodynamic characteristics of SMAAC with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach, for various cases between altitude of 58 km and 1.0 km, i.e., from a supersonic flow regime to a subsonic one. In the paper, the simulated drag coefficient showed good agreement with the measured results.…”
Section: Fig 1 Configuration Of Smaacmentioning
confidence: 99%