The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1995
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00267-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerobic domestic waste water treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with Fig. 7: Effect of flow rate on sludge age those of Muller et al [16] who showed that a very low biomass production could be achieved when a very high influent flow rate is applied. Figure 7 shows that increasing the flow rate will decrease the sludge age in the reactor, hence, the removal efficiency of the aeration basin decreases.…”
Section: Effect Of Influent Flow Ratesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results agree with Fig. 7: Effect of flow rate on sludge age those of Muller et al [16] who showed that a very low biomass production could be achieved when a very high influent flow rate is applied. Figure 7 shows that increasing the flow rate will decrease the sludge age in the reactor, hence, the removal efficiency of the aeration basin decreases.…”
Section: Effect Of Influent Flow Ratesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, complete sludge retention had little impact on wastewater treatment performance. The content of polluting trace elements were similar to that of a conventional treatment plant, though the fraction of inorganic compounds in sludge increased to 23.5% from 21.6% [80]. The low sludge production (0.002-0.032 kg/d) was observed in a pilot submerged MBR operating for one year without sludge discharge (Table 3) [81].…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Zero sludge production could be achieved at high sludge concentration (15-23 g/l) and F=M ratios as low as about 0.07 Kg COD (kg MLSS) À1 d À1 in a pilot submerged MBR with complete sludge retention [82,83]. Their investigations showed that the sludge reduction in MBR systems by higher organisms (protozoa/metazoa) was ruled out, and bacteria maintenance metabolism caused little/zero sludge production [80][81][82][83][84][85]. The absence of protozoa and metazoa in MBR systems occurred in their observations, but no reason was given to explain it.…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the strong aeration condition (50 m 3 m −2 h −1 ) in the bioreactor, it is difficult to think that oxygen supply might be the problem. However, oxygen transfer limitations might occur inside the floes of activated sludge due to the increase of EPSs (Lübbeke et al, 1995;Muller et al, 1995). So, the increase of menaquinones from 8 to 14% with the prolongation of operational period, except for period 2, in the nitrification system was probably related with the existence of nitrate/nitrite respiration because of the limitation of oxygen transfer.…”
Section: Quinone Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%