2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1270-9638(01)01123-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroacoustic integral methods, formulation and efficient numerical implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in results between the FW-H method and the Kirchhoff method has been found to be depend on the surface location [7,15,16]. A surface in the source region will produce higher differences than a surface in the acoustic propagation region.…”
Section: Specification Of Integral Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in results between the FW-H method and the Kirchhoff method has been found to be depend on the surface location [7,15,16]. A surface in the source region will produce higher differences than a surface in the acoustic propagation region.…”
Section: Specification Of Integral Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of the Kirchhoff method have been discussed in the literature [12][13][14]. Contrary to the Kirchhoff method, the analytical solution of the FW-H method involves the nonlinear effects on and outside the integral surface [7,15,16]. Theoretical and numerical differences have been evaluated to predict the noise from, for example, helicopter rotors [6,7,15,16] and jets [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aeroacoustic integral method relies on the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings equation [40], in its rotating solid surface formulation, as implemented in the KIM solver [41]. The solid surface is the blade in rotation, during its last rotation.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,14,15 The differences have been evaluated numerically to predict the noise from, for example, helicopter rotors 5,6,15 and jets.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an advantage since it brings less limitation on the location of the surface. 6,14,15 The surface can be placed in the area where nonlinear effects exist. That is, the distance can be closer to the walls or the intensive flow area in the FWH method than the Kirchhoff method.…”
Section: Iic Definition Of the Integral Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%