The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.640446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial Swarm Defense by StringNet Herding: Theory and Experiments

Abstract: This paper studies a defense approach against one or more swarms of adversarial agents. In our earlier work, we employed a closed formation (“StringNet”) of defending agents (defenders) around a swarm of adversarial agents (attackers) to confine their motion within given bounds, and guide them to a safe area. The adversarial agents were assumed to remain close enough to each other, i.e., within a prescribed connectivity region. To handle situations when the attackers no longer stay within such a connectivity r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varava et al (2017); Song et al (2021) developed a "herding by caging" solution, based on geometric considerations and motion planning techniques to arrange the herder agents around the flock. A similar formation was presented in Chipade and Panagou (2019), and further developed in Chipade et al (2021), to let herders identify clusters of flocking adversarial agents, dynamically encircle and drive them to a safe zone. Recently, Sebastián and Montijano (2021) developed analytical and numerical control design procedures to compute suitable herding actions to herd evading agents to a desired position, even when the nonlinearities in the evaders' dynamics yield implicit equations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Varava et al (2017); Song et al (2021) developed a "herding by caging" solution, based on geometric considerations and motion planning techniques to arrange the herder agents around the flock. A similar formation was presented in Chipade and Panagou (2019), and further developed in Chipade et al (2021), to let herders identify clusters of flocking adversarial agents, dynamically encircle and drive them to a safe zone. Recently, Sebastián and Montijano (2021) developed analytical and numerical control design procedures to compute suitable herding actions to herd evading agents to a desired position, even when the nonlinearities in the evaders' dynamics yield implicit equations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A herder's action is based on the global knowledge of the environment and of the positions of all other agents. With respect to other solutions in the literature (Lien et al 2004;Pierson and Schwager 2018;Chipade et al 2021;Song et al 2021), our approach does not involve the use of ad hoc formation control strategies to force the herders surround the herd, but we rather enforce cooperation between herders by dynamically dividing the plane among them by means of simple yet effective and robust rules that can be easily implemented in real robots.…”
Section: Contributions Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution involves distributing image classification tasks among a group of UAVs, enabling quick image recognition and faster decision-making. [38] introduces and verifies a defensive approach known as "Multi-Swarm StringNet Herding" developed to confront adversarial swarms with a group of defenders. The methodology develops and validates a decentralized version of the Mixed-Integer Quadratically Constrained Program to effectively allocate defenders to identified attacker swarms.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shepherding model consists of two parts: shepherd agents and herd agents. One or more shepherd agents escort non-cooperative herd agents to the goal area [25], or the defense swarm is treated as multiple shepherd agents, which "escort" attackers to the safety area [26]. However, this problem differs from the escort model in that the HVU has a preset goal rather than being driven by the escort process dynamically.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%