2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeration costs in stirred-tank and bubble column bioreactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TEA screening indicated that all four pathways exhibited the technical potential to achieve $3/GGE MFSPs, albeit all would require substantial assistance from lignin coproducts (consistent with prior findings noted above), but significantly more so for the aerobic cases relative to anaerobic (Figure 1, where the bottom negative bar represents the coproduct revenues required from lignin inclusive of lignin coproduct processing costs). This was due to inherently lower energy (GGE) yields and higher processing costs for aerobic bioconversion compared to anaerobic, with the latter tied to the costs of delivering and solubilizing oxygen to an aerobic bioreactor [13].…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TEA screening indicated that all four pathways exhibited the technical potential to achieve $3/GGE MFSPs, albeit all would require substantial assistance from lignin coproducts (consistent with prior findings noted above), but significantly more so for the aerobic cases relative to anaerobic (Figure 1, where the bottom negative bar represents the coproduct revenues required from lignin inclusive of lignin coproduct processing costs). This was due to inherently lower energy (GGE) yields and higher processing costs for aerobic bioconversion compared to anaerobic, with the latter tied to the costs of delivering and solubilizing oxygen to an aerobic bioreactor [13].…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As introduced in Section 1.1, compared to anaerobic fermentation, aerobic bioconversion is constrained by higher costs for oxygen delivery, both for the equipment to compress and sparge air into the bioreactor media, as well as associated power demands for compression and cooling demands for removing more evolved heat [13]. However, more significant factors are the economy-of-scale penalties for significantly smaller bioreactor volumes (500-1,000 m 3 as required for maintaining uniform concentrations of dissolved oxygen and more stringent control of fed-batch fermentations), compared to anaerobic batch bioreactors on the order of 1 MM gal (roughly 4,000 m 3 ) [54,55].…”
Section: Design Basis Anaerobic Fermentation: Background Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operation of bioreactors is complex since sterility is required and, to achieve high oxygen transfer rates, high agitation and aeration rates are needed. High power demand is needed for the function of the agitator and the air compressor [43]. For larger reactors, larger agitators and moving parts are required and that is translated to higher power per unit volume required to achieve the desired oxygenation levels.…”
Section: Bioreactor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas–liquid multiphase reactors, which are used to improve mass transfer, are commonly used in the form of stirred reactors, bubble columns, falling film reactors, jet flow, and airlift reactors . Taylor–Couette vortex bioreactors are prime examples of reactors that use inner wall rotation to generating the pairs of toroidal vortices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%