2022
DOI: 10.1177/00027642221083531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advocating for Transgender Immigrants in Detention Centers: Cisnormativity as a Tool for Racialized Social Control

Abstract: Despite public concern over immigration enforcement, little attention has been given to transgender immigrants, who are disproportionately at risk for arrest and deportation. Organizations dedicated to protecting LGBT people’s rights and immigrant rights have been working to address this issue and shape policy decisions to better protect transgender immigrants in detention centers; however, research has not investigated how these organizations frame transgender immigrant detainees and their experience in deten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical legal scholars have described how solicitation laws and other policies used to justify ‘quality-of-life’ or ‘broken windows’ policing function to intimidate, control, and financially exploit people of color with intersecting marginalized identities, including transgender women of color [ 64 – 67 ]. These include laws criminalizing behaviors deemed signifiers of disorder or immorality under hegemonic White supremacy and cisheteropatriarchy (e.g., loitering, vagrancy), laws criminalizing engagement in survival economies (e.g., sex work), laws governing law enforcement conduct (e.g., stop-and-frisk, racial and ethnic profiling), and laws structuring the legal systems through which those charged with de minimis offenses (i.e., those typically punished via fines and/or short incarceration periods) are sentenced [ 62 , 67 – 71 ]. How the full scope of these laws are enacted and enforced against transgender women of color remains poorly documented and understudied [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical legal scholars have described how solicitation laws and other policies used to justify ‘quality-of-life’ or ‘broken windows’ policing function to intimidate, control, and financially exploit people of color with intersecting marginalized identities, including transgender women of color [ 64 – 67 ]. These include laws criminalizing behaviors deemed signifiers of disorder or immorality under hegemonic White supremacy and cisheteropatriarchy (e.g., loitering, vagrancy), laws criminalizing engagement in survival economies (e.g., sex work), laws governing law enforcement conduct (e.g., stop-and-frisk, racial and ethnic profiling), and laws structuring the legal systems through which those charged with de minimis offenses (i.e., those typically punished via fines and/or short incarceration periods) are sentenced [ 62 , 67 – 71 ]. How the full scope of these laws are enacted and enforced against transgender women of color remains poorly documented and understudied [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victoria Kurdyla’s (2022) article, “Advocating for Transgender Immigrants in Detention Centers: Cisnormativity as a Tool for Racialized Social Control,” advances a potential response. Kurdyla compared the framing strategies of two legal advocacy groups around the issue of transgender migrants in detention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%