2011
DOI: 10.1108/00242531111147189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advocacy and evidence for sustainable public computer access

Abstract: Purpose -This paper aims to draw together the evidence-based advocacy experience of five national programs focused on developing public access information and communications technologies (ICT) via public libraries as grantees of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Global Libraries Initiative. Design/methodology/approach -The authors describe a common approach to strategic advocacy and to impact planning and assessment. They then outline the experience of each program in using a range of evidence to help meet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Global Libraries programme was set up specifically to try to address the information divide, by finding ways of providing wider free access to the Internet to people who either did not have any access, or who only had very limited access at a cost beyond their means. The programme was realistic in its aspirations, not intervening in the places with greatest poverty, but in countries with sufficient information infrastructure and a network of public libraries upon which to build (Sawaya et al, 2011). The programme is due to complete in 2018, with three legacy partners, the Public Library Association, the Technology and Social Change Group at the University of Washington (TASCHA) and IFLA, to continue the work through the International Advocacy programme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Global Libraries programme was set up specifically to try to address the information divide, by finding ways of providing wider free access to the Internet to people who either did not have any access, or who only had very limited access at a cost beyond their means. The programme was realistic in its aspirations, not intervening in the places with greatest poverty, but in countries with sufficient information infrastructure and a network of public libraries upon which to build (Sawaya et al, 2011). The programme is due to complete in 2018, with three legacy partners, the Public Library Association, the Technology and Social Change Group at the University of Washington (TASCHA) and IFLA, to continue the work through the International Advocacy programme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chowdhury and Koya (2017) identify over 30 information-related themes that are embedded in the UN’s (2015) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) policy documents, evidencing the key role that access to information has in building stronger economies. Work on the Global Libraries Initiative also reinforces the extent to which information poverty continues to be a priority for international development organisations (Sawaya et al, 2011). Sadly, however, that programme will be concluded in 2018, with only a legacy element to continue.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is not to feed into representations of African libraries as chronically underresourced and lacking in capacity, but rather, to constructively engage with first-hand accounts of how librarians are experiencing and actively navigating barriers in order to offer potential avenues forward for the field. As the analysis will show, the local, social context of knowledge production plays a large role in the capacity of libraries to enact evidencebased advocacy (Bundy, 2003;Sawaya et al, 2011), and this may be overlooked in capacity-building efforts. This understanding, then, exists at "the intersection of information science and social scientific thinking and practice" (Cronin, 2008: 465), and it is presented for those who collect data on African libraries as well as those who support the use of data in these settings to gain insight and spark reflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that librarians must constantly demonstrate the importance of IRs so as to promote visibility of scholarly productivity of members of the faculty, students, staff, administration, alumnae, and other interest groups and friends of the academic institutions. Sawaya et al (2011) explain that advocacy encompasses actions to influence decision making at local, regional, state, national, and international levels. In line with this, Ezema (2011) adds that the use of advocacy has been found to be an efficient method of effecting changes in organizations and in the wider society, and, therefore, could be applied to creating awareness in the use of IRs for disseminating research findings of the institutions involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%