1995
DOI: 10.1080/00207549508904876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADVISOR: A computer-aided material handling equipment selection system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Welgama and Gibson [11] proposed a methodology for automating the selection of an MH system while combining the knowledgebase and optimization approaches. Chu et al [12] developed a microcomputer-based system called "ADVISOR" to help user to design, select, and evaluate the proper MH equipment for a production shop. Chan et al [13] proposed an intelligent MH equipment selection advisor (MHESA), composed of a database to store equipment types with their speci�cations, knowledge-based expert system for assisting MH equipment selection, and an AHP model to choose the most appropriate MH equipment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welgama and Gibson [11] proposed a methodology for automating the selection of an MH system while combining the knowledgebase and optimization approaches. Chu et al [12] developed a microcomputer-based system called "ADVISOR" to help user to design, select, and evaluate the proper MH equipment for a production shop. Chan et al [13] proposed an intelligent MH equipment selection advisor (MHESA), composed of a database to store equipment types with their speci�cations, knowledge-based expert system for assisting MH equipment selection, and an AHP model to choose the most appropriate MH equipment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many di erent approaches have been proposed in the past. Chu et al (1995) as well as Kim and Eom (1997) have proposed expert-based system approaches. A closely related approach is that of knowledge based solutions.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They used pairwise comparison matrices to measure the relative importance of each criteria, subcriteria and sub-subcriteria and then determined the overall ranking of each alternative equipment. Chu et al (1995) developed a computer-assisted methodology for the selection of the suitable material handling equipment. Onut et al (2009) proposed a combined MCDM methodology for evaluation and selection of material handling equipment (MHE) types for a company in the steel construction industry in Istanbul, Turkey.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%