2022
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse Maternal and Delivery Outcomes in Children and Very Young (Age ≤13 Years) US Adolescents Compared With Older Adolescents and Adults

Abstract: This study uses a US claims database to compare morbidity and delivery outcomes among pregnant 10- to 13-year-olds vs 14- to 17-year-olds and 18- to 19-year-olds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,7 At the same time, it is recognized that pregnant adolescents have at least twice the rate of preeclampsia/eclampsia and CD compared to adults 20 years old or older 10 ; the risk for these adverse maternal outcomes is significantly higher in very young adolescents compared to older adolescents. 10,11 In concordance with what has been published, we observed in our adolescent cohort that preeclampsia/eclampsia and CD were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our cohort did not reflect the increased risk for PTD or FGR reported in general pregnant people infected with COVID-19 4,7 ; this may be explained by the limited number of eligible adolescent pregnancies during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,7 At the same time, it is recognized that pregnant adolescents have at least twice the rate of preeclampsia/eclampsia and CD compared to adults 20 years old or older 10 ; the risk for these adverse maternal outcomes is significantly higher in very young adolescents compared to older adolescents. 10,11 In concordance with what has been published, we observed in our adolescent cohort that preeclampsia/eclampsia and CD were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our cohort did not reflect the increased risk for PTD or FGR reported in general pregnant people infected with COVID-19 4,7 ; this may be explained by the limited number of eligible adolescent pregnancies during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, we sought to study obstetric and neonatal outcomes among pregnant adolescents infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared with those associated with noninfected pregnant adolescents during the beginning of the pandemic before availability of COVID-19 immunization. Because very young teens are at higher obstetric risk than older teens, 10,11 we also evaluated clinical outcomes of pregnant adolescents infected with SARS-CoV-2 stratified by age. We hypothesize that pregnant adolescent patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 remain at increased risk for adverse obstetric and nonobstetric outcomes compared with noninfected pregnant adolescent patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] However, this physiological theory to explain PTB has historically remained contested since gravid adolescents were found to have socioeconomic factors that are associated with a higher risk of PTB, which may contribute to this outcome, [35][36][37] although the results of our study argue against this. Our study also demonstrates that this PTB risk is increased in Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression showing association of adolescent subgroups (younger [13][14][15][16][17] and older [18][19]) with adverse outcomes, as compared with adults…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…First, although this study included a sensitivity analysis based on history of depression, study design, and definitions of pregnancy as unintended, the potential effects of maternal age on adverse maternal and delivery outcomes should not be overlooked. Prior studies have found that very young individuals (aged ≤13 years) or older people (aged >45 years) have a higher risk of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, whether or not they intended to get pregnant. Therefore, a more detailed subgroup analysis in this study of whether there was a restriction of maternal age in the included studies would be helpful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%