2011
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e318214feee
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse Health Effects for Individuals Who Move Between HIV Care Centers

Abstract: We suspect that despite forward planning, a move may result in potential serious interruptions and/or disengagements of care. The potential harmful health effects can in some be equivalent becoming LTFU. Recognizing and addressing the potential disruption in care from a planned move may be of value in improving outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may be largely explained by the fact that patients exposed to IPV were twice as likely to have interruptions in care with associated increases in viral load. Continuity in care is one of the most important predictors of survival and disease progression in the HAART era [37][38][39][40]. The clinical impact of IPV was further supported by a higher hospitalization rate for HIVrelated causes, probably reflecting this poor engagement in care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may be largely explained by the fact that patients exposed to IPV were twice as likely to have interruptions in care with associated increases in viral load. Continuity in care is one of the most important predictors of survival and disease progression in the HAART era [37][38][39][40]. The clinical impact of IPV was further supported by a higher hospitalization rate for HIVrelated causes, probably reflecting this poor engagement in care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, most measures of engagement in-care fail to take consideration of the fact that individuals may seek care from other providers. The implications of such individuals for the overall care cascade are unclear – in Southern Alberta, patients who left the HIV care program but who returned at a later date had deterioration in both CD4 + cell counts and new AIDS events compared with those who had never left the program, in whom CD4 + cell counts increased [ 41 ]. In contrast, transfers into the care centre from outside the area had greater engagement in-care than local patients [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention using the HAB-MV performance measure was also associated with VL suppression at 12 months, but when HAB-MV was assessed over a 5.6 year follow-up period and dichotomized to patients who met the criterion in all years of follow-up or not, the measure was not associated with a greater likelihood of VL suppression [13]. More recently this measure was shown to have the highest optimal predictive value compared with VL outcomes [27]. Our work adds to a small but growing body of evidence supporting the usefulness of readily available electronic medical record data and the HAB-MV measure as a performance metric.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%