Adverse events reporting by obstetric units in Norway as part of their quality assurance and patient safety work: an analysis of practice

Abstract

Background The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision aims to contribute to the improvement of quality and patient safety in the healthcare services. Planned audits were performed to investigate how 12 selected Norwegian obstetric units reported and analyzed adverse events as the part of their quality assurance and patient safety work. Methods Serious adverse events coded as birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage that occurred during 2014 (the most recent year for which the quality assured data were available) were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. The obstetric units were asked to submit medical records, internal adverse events reports, and their internal guidelines outlining which events should be reported to the quality assurance system. We identified the adverse events at each obstetric unit that were reported internally and/or to the central authorities. Two obstetricians carried out an evaluation of each event reported. Results Five hundred fifty-three serious adverse events were registered among 17,323 births that took place at the selected units. Twenty-one events were excluded because of incorrect coding or missing information. Eight events were registered in more than one category, and these were distributed to the category directly related to injury or adverse outcome. Nine of twelve (75 %) obstetric units had written guidelines describing which events should be reported. The obstetric units reported 49 of 524 (9.3 %) serious adverse events in their internal quality assurance system and 39 (7.4 %) to central authorities. Of the very serious adverse events, 29 of 149 (19.4 %) were reported. Twenty-three of 49 (47 %) reports did not contain relevant assessments or proposals for improving quality and patient safety. Conclusions This study showed that adverse event reporting and analyses by Norwegian obstetric units, as a part of quality assurance and patient safety work, are suboptimal. The reporting culture and compliance with guidelines need to be improved substantially for better safety in patient care, risk mitigation and clinical quality assurance.

Non-technical skills in Obstetric Aeromedical Transfers (NOAT): development and evaluation of a behavioural marker system

“…Protocols and guidelines are particularly important for multidisciplinary teams where the team members are not accustomed to working together, so adherence to best practice guidelines helps team members to understand what is expected of each other without limiting clinical judgment (74). This also involves strategies such as recording near misses and errors objectively (Table 4) (33, 75, 76)…”

“…An increasing body of knowledge in maternity care supports the view that nontechnical skills are paramount for maintaining safe clinical performance (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). For example, a recent report from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists identified situational awareness to be a factor in 44%, intra/interprofessional communication in 45%, and team leadership in 22% of adverse events and patient harms (34).…”

“…Protocols and guidelines are particularly important for multidisciplinary teams where the team members are not accustomed to working together, so adherence to best practice guidelines helps team members to understand what is expected of each other without limiting clinical judgment (74). This also involves strategies such as recording near misses and errors objectively (Table 4) (33,75,76) Teamwork It is crucial that multidisciplinary team members interact to facilitate a shared understanding of what is happening currently, and work towards a common goal in a team context (77)(78)(79). Teamwork includes the skill elements of supporting others, solving conflict, exchanging information, and coordinating activities (14).…”

Safety culture in maternity hospital: Perception of nurse‐midwives

“…shows that the different professionals have little feedback on the process of conducting reported errors. An aspect in contrast to the known benefits of transparent reporting and appropriate analysis of adverse events, which are a prerequisite for learning, risk management and increasing the reporting culture (Johansen et al, 2021).…”

Room for improvement in maternity care

“…Dessverre viste det seg at bare 9 % av de alvorlige hendelsene ble meldt. Halvparten av disse fikk en relevant vurdering (15). Ser man på hendelser med et svaert alvorlig utfall, ble 19 % meldt i det interne avvikssystemet.…”