Adverse events recorded in English primary care: observational study using the General Practice Research Database

Abstract

BackgroundMore accurate and recent estimates of adverse events in primary care are necessary to assign resources for improvement of patient safety, while predictors must be identified to ameliorate patient risk. AimTo determine the incidence of recorded iatrogenic harm in general practice and identify risk factors for these adverse events. Design and settingCross-sectional sample of 74 763 patients at 457 English general practices between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2008, obtained from the General Practice Research Database. MethodPatient age at study entry, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, practice region, duration registered at practice, continuity of care, comorbidities, and health service use were extracted from the data. Adverse events were defined by Read Codes for complications of care (Chapters S, T, and U). Crude and adjusted analyses were performed by Poisson regression, using generalised estimating equations. ResultsThe incidence was 6.0 adverse events per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.74 to 6.27), equivalent to eight adverse events per 10 000 consultations (n = 2 540 877). After adjustment, patients aged 65-84 years (risk ratio [RR] = 5.62, 95% CI = 4.58 to 6.91; P<0.001), with the most consultations (RR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.60 to 2.86; P<0.001), five or more emergency admissions (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.60; P<0.001), or the most diseases according to expanded diagnosis clusters (RR = 8.46, 95% CI = 5.68 to 12.6; P<0.001) were at greater risk of adverse events. Patients registered at their practice for the longest periods of time were less at risk of an adverse event (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.47; P<0.001). ConclusionThe low incidence of recorded adverse events is comparable with other studies. Temporal sequencing of risk factors and case ascertainment would benefit from data triangulation. Future studies may explore whether first adverse events predict future incidents.

Medication safety challenges in primary care: Nurses’ perspective

“…Medication‐related problems have been identified from various sources in the literature including incident reporting by healthcare professionals, medico‐legal and patient complaints and systematic identification of organisational structure (Department of Health ; Tsang, Bottle, Majeed, & Aylin, ; Wallace, Lowry, Smith, & Fahey, ).…”

A Process Mining and Text Analysis Approach to Analyse the Extent of Polypharmacy in Medical Prescribing

“…Certain age groups and clusters of diseases place patients at increased risk. Little is known of the effect of polypharmacy and patterns of prescribing on multimorbid patients [49]. Our initial analysis showed that almost 62% of patients in our sample were prescribed drugs for which some form of interaction is known; strongly interacting for nearly 40%.…”

Design and Testing of the Safety Agenda Mobile App for Managing Health Care Managers’ Patient Safety Responsibilities

“…In the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s member countries, 9% of hospitalized patients [1] suffer an adverse event, whereas studies in primary care centers have identified a rate of adverse events of less than 2% for all consultations [3,4]. At hospitals and primary care centers, 18% and 7% of patients, respectively, experienced more than 1 adverse event [4,5].…”