Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology

Abstract

ObjectiveHome healthcare is an increasingly common part of healthcare. The patients are often aged, frail and have multiple diseases, and multiple caregivers are involved in their treatment. This study explores the origin, incidence, types and preventability of adverse events (AEs) that occur in patients receiving home healthcare.DesignA study using retrospective record review and trigger tool methodology.Setting and methodsTen teams with experience of home healthcare from nine regions across Sweden reviewed home healthcare records in a two-stage procedure using 38 predefined triggers in four modules. A random sample of records from 600 patients (aged 18 years or older) receiving home healthcare during 2015 were reviewed.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe cumulative incidence of AEs found in patients receiving home healthcare; secondary measures were origin, types, severity of harm and preventability of the AEs.ResultsThe patients were aged 20–79 years, 280 men and 320 women. The review teams identified 356 AEs in 226 (37.7%; 95% CI 33.0 to 42.8) of the home healthcare records. Of these, 255 (71.6%; 95% CI 63.2 to 80.8) were assessed as being preventable, and most (246, 69.1%; 95% CI 60.9 to 78.2) required extra healthcare visits or led to a prolonged period of healthcare. Most of the AEs (271, 76.1%; 95% CI 67.5 to 85.6) originated in home healthcare; the rest were detected during home healthcare but were related to care outside home healthcare. The most common AEs were healthcare-associated infections, falls and pressure ulcers.ConclusionsAEs in patients receiving home healthcare are common, mostly preventable and often cause temporary harm requiring extra healthcare resources. The most frequent types of AEs must be addressed and reduced through improvements in interprofessional collaboration. This is an important area for future studies.

Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool

“…The IHI Global Trigger Tool [18] has been used since 2008. Trigger tools have also been adapted for specific areas, such as paediatric care [19,20], primary care [21] and home healthcare [22]. In mental health services there is a trigger tool for measuring adverse drug events [23], and a combined trigger tool for detecting somatic AEs and mental health-related patient safety incidents [12].…”

Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Risk When Care Is Given in Patients' Homes

“…The provision of healthcare services is primarily the responsibility of the 21 county councils in Sweden. There are also 290 Swedish municipalities that have a legal obligation to take a recent retrospective record review in home care settings in Sweden (Schildmeijer et al, 2018), AEs were identified in 37.7% of the records examined, with 71.6% of AEs considered preventable. The most common AEs found were healthcare-associated infections, falls, and pressure ulcers.…”

Waiting time to surgery is correlated with an increased risk of serious adverse events during hospital stay in patients with hip-fracture: A cohort study

“…The GTT was initially developed to monitor AE rates over time and measure the effectiveness of patient-safety interventions 118,119 . The GTT has been used internationally for retrospective reviews in patient safety initiatives, initially within hospital care [120][121][122] , but it is now spreading to other healthcare settings 123,124 .…”