Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Studies suggest that advancing age is an independent risk factor for experiencing adverse events during colonoscopy. Yet many of these studies are limited by small sample sizes and/or marked variation in reported outcomes. Objective To determine the incidence rates for specific adverse events in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy and calculate incidence rate ratios for selected comparison groups. Setting and Patients Elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Main Outcome Measurements Perforation, bleeding, cardiovascular (CV)/pulmonary complications, and mortality. Results Our literature search yielded 3328 articles, of which 20 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled incidence rates for adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) in patients 65 years of age and older were 26.0 (95% CI, 25.0–27.0) for cumulative GI adverse events, 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9–1.5) for perforation, 6.3 (95% CI, 5.7–7.0) for GI bleeding, 19.1 (95% CI, 18.0–20.3) for CV/pulmonary complications, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7–2.2) for mortality. Among octogenarians, adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) were as follows: cumulative GI adverse event rate of 34.9 (95% CI, 31.9–38.0), perforation rate of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1–1.9), GI bleeding rate of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1–4.6), CV/pulmonary complication rate of 28.9 (95% CI, 26.2–31.8), and mortality rate of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.06–1.9). Patients 80 years of age and older experienced higher rates of cumulative GI adverse events (incidence rate ratio 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5–1.9) and had a greater risk of perforation (incidence rate ratio 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2–2.1) compared with younger patients (younger than 80 years of age). There was an increased trend toward higher rates of GI bleeding and CV/pulmonary complications in octogenarians but neither was statistically significant. Limitations Heterogeneity of studies included and not all complications related to colonoscopy were captured. Conclusions Elderly patients, especially octogenarians, appear to have a higher risk of complications during and after colonoscopy. These data should inform clinical decision making, the consent process, public health policy, and comparative effectiveness analyses.

Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

“…Our search identified five potentially relevant studies. [113][114][115][116][117] These were four reviews [113][114][115][116] and one population-based study. 117 Two of the reviews, by Manta et al 115 and Church, 116 were overviews that did not include a systematic approach to searching literature; neither did these reviews include further analysis.…”

“…117 Two of the reviews, by Manta et al 115 and Church, 116 were overviews that did not include a systematic approach to searching literature; neither did these reviews include further analysis. The two other reviews, by Reumkens et al 113 and Day et al, 114 were systematic literature reviews and both included a meta-analysis. The review by Day et al…”

HyGIeaCare® Preparation for Colonoscopy-A Technical Update for Success

“…Over-distention of the colon occurring with colonoscopy has the potential for perforation, with reported rates ranging from 0.05% to 0.3% in large studies [13][14][15]. The right colon is more susceptible to barotrauma-induced perforation due to compliance, i.e.…”

Sigmoid looping is not always benign

“…The reported incidence of mortality is 1 in 1000 individuals. When compared with the other age groups, cardiopulmonary complications have been noted to be higher in octogenarians (up to 28.9 per 1000 individuals) [1] . Considering the possibility of herniation of the bowel contents, such as a colonoscope passed into a hernial defect, it would be expected that adequate space is necessary to allow the passage of the scope into a hernial sac.…”