2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03899-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse events associated with pediatric complementary and alternative medicine in the Netherlands: a national surveillance study

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect harm may be associated with CAM due to beliefs of efficacy causing a delay in the diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition, cessation of prescription drugs, social withdrawal, and extreme restrictive diets [22,36,37]. Direct clinical harm may be associated with the CAM therapy itself, for example by ingestion or topical application, interactions with conventional medications, incorrect diagnosis by CAM specialist, or body manipulation methods [22,36,37]. In the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indirect harm may be associated with CAM due to beliefs of efficacy causing a delay in the diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition, cessation of prescription drugs, social withdrawal, and extreme restrictive diets [22,36,37]. Direct clinical harm may be associated with the CAM therapy itself, for example by ingestion or topical application, interactions with conventional medications, incorrect diagnosis by CAM specialist, or body manipulation methods [22,36,37]. In the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, while it may be considered that CAM such as spiritual practices (prayer and meditation in the current study) are relatively 'hands-off', the use of all types of CAM may have direct or indirect safety issues [36]. Indirect harm may be associated with CAM due to beliefs of efficacy causing a delay in the diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition, cessation of prescription drugs, social withdrawal, and extreme restrictive diets [22,36,37]. Direct clinical harm may be associated with the CAM therapy itself, for example by ingestion or topical application, interactions with conventional medications, incorrect diagnosis by CAM specialist, or body manipulation methods [22,36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Despite many AH practices being physically harmless, some do entail significant risks of adverse events [ 2 , 10 , 11 ]. Research suggests that people are now more frequently engaging in AH practices that involve risk, such as utilizing unproven therapeutics instead of medically established ones [ 2 , 11 , 12 ]. This trend has significant health policy and practice implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, evidence from clinical trials suggests a high degree of variation in terms of quality of data/ evidence [35] and scientifically proven efficacy for different types of CAMs [33]. Poor efficacies across populations increase the risk of unintended adverse reactions [36][37][38][39]. Hence, there is an urgent need to optimize the use of CAMs by identifying their potential-if any-for treatment, as well as identify any associated risks [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%