2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.16.20232876
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract: IntroductionIn an attempt to improve outcomes for patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), several drugs, such as remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine (with or without azithromycin), and lopinavir/ritonavir, have been evaluated for treatment. While much attention focuses on potential benefits of these drugs, this must be weighed against their adverse effects.MethodsWe searched 32 databases in multiple languages from 1 December 2019 to 27 October 2020. We included randomized trials if they compared any of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The different timing of enrollment made the two cohorts not perfectly comparable. The enrollment of all patients of the Brescia cohort during the first wave has probably magnified the risk of side effects of therapeutic regimens administered during the first wave [27,28] and the challenges to delivering the standard of care in an overwhelmed and unprepared hospital. Lastly, a lower age (56.1 vs 60 years) in our cohort of patients has probably contributed to lead to a better prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different timing of enrollment made the two cohorts not perfectly comparable. The enrollment of all patients of the Brescia cohort during the first wave has probably magnified the risk of side effects of therapeutic regimens administered during the first wave [27,28] and the challenges to delivering the standard of care in an overwhelmed and unprepared hospital. Lastly, a lower age (56.1 vs 60 years) in our cohort of patients has probably contributed to lead to a better prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite efforts on many fronts, specific therapeutic approaches to treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 have yielded variable or no significant benefit compared to standard of care [5–9]. These include remdesivir, immune plasma, monoclonal antibodies against spike protein and anti‐inflammatory agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Wang's study (21), which was performed based on two studies conducted by Beigel and Wang, founded that the risk of adverse events for remdesivir was significantly lower than the placebo/control. Izcovich et al (2020) also stated that remdesivir might have negligible effects on acute kidney injury and cognitive dysfunction/delirium (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%