2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met met/met genotype in methamphetamine-related executive dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between CSF NE and neurocognition is also likely influenced by brain regional differences in the rate of NE metabolism, which is primarily carried out by the monoamine oxidase A and catechol-omethyltransferase (COMT) enzymes 17 . COMT, for example, is particularly active in clearing catecholamines from the prefrontal cortex and we have previously reported that the neurocognitive effects of HIV and METH are moderated by genetic variation in COMT 73,79,80 . The neurobehavioral effects of COMT are often attributed to the processing of dopamine, which may be increased or decreased in HIV and METH depending on disease stage and abstinence [81][82][83] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between CSF NE and neurocognition is also likely influenced by brain regional differences in the rate of NE metabolism, which is primarily carried out by the monoamine oxidase A and catechol-omethyltransferase (COMT) enzymes 17 . COMT, for example, is particularly active in clearing catecholamines from the prefrontal cortex and we have previously reported that the neurocognitive effects of HIV and METH are moderated by genetic variation in COMT 73,79,80 . The neurobehavioral effects of COMT are often attributed to the processing of dopamine, which may be increased or decreased in HIV and METH depending on disease stage and abstinence [81][82][83] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consistent with this variability, parameters of METH use are not predictive of neuropsychological performance and it has been suggested that substance use during adolescence or young adulthood can interfere with educational quality, which may obscure the detection of brain-behavior relationships in adulthood 70,71 . Other factors such as host genetics, including those involved in the metabolism of METH and catecholamines 72,73 , may also help clarify the role of NE in METH-associated neurobehavioral function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In people with methamphetamine dependence having the Val allele, EF is protected due to greater inactivation of dopamine, which suggests that vulnerability to executive dysfunction among methamphetamine users is driven by genetics. Additionally, COMT genotyping could lead to personalized management of neurocognitive effects among methamphetamine users [ 26 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These demographically-corrected individual test T scores were averaged within each neurocognitive ability domain to generate domain-specific T scores. Given the relevance of COMT to DAergic activity in the PFC (Meyer-Lindenberg et al, 2006) and our prior findings that COMT interacts with METH status to predict executive function, secondary analyses focused on the relationship between CSF DA and executive function T scores (Cherner et al, 2019). The executive function composite was composed of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-item-computerized version, Stroop Color-Word Test, and Trail Making Test Part B.…”
Section: Neurocognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hypothesized that higher DA bioavailability conferred by the Met allele underlies this Metassociated neurocognitive 'advantage' in healthy adults. However, we have previously demonstrated that in chronic METH users (both HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative), whose PFC is repeatedly exposed to excessive levels of DA, the Met/Met genotype is no longer associated with better executive function and may in fact confer risk for executive dysfunction (Bousman et al, 2010;Cherner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%