2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse childhood experiences and co-occurring psychological distress and substance abuse among juvenile offenders: the role of protective factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bivariate relations of several protective factors with psychopathology symptoms (Table 2) demonstrate a small protective effect, but the inclusion of cumulative ACE exposure and simultaneously occurring protective factors negates such an effect. This finding may be unique to this sample, as other studies demonstrate a protective role of several protective factors in the presence of cumulative ACE exposure (Clements-Nolle & Waddington, 2019;Lensch et al, 2021aLensch et al, , 2021b. This may be explained by the high ACE exposure in the sample (49% of youth had 4 or more ACEs) and low mean levels of several protective factors (Empathy: M = 0.97; Prosocial Peers: M = 0.86; Prosocial Community: M = 0.47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bivariate relations of several protective factors with psychopathology symptoms (Table 2) demonstrate a small protective effect, but the inclusion of cumulative ACE exposure and simultaneously occurring protective factors negates such an effect. This finding may be unique to this sample, as other studies demonstrate a protective role of several protective factors in the presence of cumulative ACE exposure (Clements-Nolle & Waddington, 2019;Lensch et al, 2021aLensch et al, , 2021b. This may be explained by the high ACE exposure in the sample (49% of youth had 4 or more ACEs) and low mean levels of several protective factors (Empathy: M = 0.97; Prosocial Peers: M = 0.86; Prosocial Community: M = 0.47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Additionally, these findings help bolster the current literature (Cui, Oshri et al, 2020;Davis et al, 2019;Lensch et al, 2021a;Sparks et al, 2021) that the development of protective factors, both developing from within the individual and from their environment, may be an important intervention strategy in decreasing a youth's involvement in the criminal justice system. While the current literature contains a variety of theories concerning the role of protective factors in offending patterns (Serin et al, 2016), the present findings identify the overall need to better understand how developing protective factors may mitigate, deter, and/or interact with a youth's risk for offending.…”
Section: Clinical and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have been mixed regarding the impact of ACEs on trauma symptoms; high-quality studies examined in a systematic review showed no evidence that higher ACEs scores predict trauma symptoms (Malvaso et al, 2021). In one study that broadened standard ACEs to include parental and/or guardian death, peer victimization, witnessing community violence, and family experiences of homelessness, JIY with co-occurring psychological and substance use difficulties reported significantly more ACES relative to those with one or no behavioral health concerns (Lensch et al, 2021). It is possible inclusion of the expanded ACEs increased predictive utility of the ACEs score in this study, suggesting the need for further research in this area among JIY.…”
Section: Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Justice-impacted Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%