2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.06.22280766
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among newborns delivered in a western African country: a case‒control study

Abstract: Background Newborns with one or more adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) are at greater risk of mortality or long-term morbidity with health impacts into adulthood. Hence, identifying ABO-associated factors is crucial for devising comprehensive and relevant interventions. The aim of this study was to identify factors that are associated with the occurrence of ABO – prematurity (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), macrosomia, congenital anomalies, asphyxia, and sepsis - among babies delivered at the only hospital of Sao To… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous maternal diabetes and newborn outcomes investigations were confirmed and expanded by this research [20]. Method of delivery, stillbirth, APGAR scores, and infant mortality match existing data, supporting that diabetes pregnancies need specific treatment to improve mother and neonate health [27,28]. Diabetes pregnancies increase neonatal mortality and morbidity, emphasized the need for specialized prenatal and perinatal care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Previous maternal diabetes and newborn outcomes investigations were confirmed and expanded by this research [20]. Method of delivery, stillbirth, APGAR scores, and infant mortality match existing data, supporting that diabetes pregnancies need specific treatment to improve mother and neonate health [27,28]. Diabetes pregnancies increase neonatal mortality and morbidity, emphasized the need for specialized prenatal and perinatal care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%