1984
DOI: 10.1177/001654928403400101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversary Vs. Developmental Journalism: Indian Mass Media At the Crossroads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singapore and other Asian nations have been criticized for using their version of the development model to reinforce government control and public obedience (Gunaratne, 2005). Development journalism's proponents claim it does not necessarily translate to reporting on leaders, policies, and projects favorably, but rather on giving priority to development news, such as helping the public see solutions to development problems, or even critically examining development policies and projects (Kelly & Ramaprasad, 2003;Rampal, 1984). Reviewing twentieth-century Asian journalism, Richstad (2000) pointed out that development journalism does not necessarily mean government control of media, but rather, constructive co-operation of government and media.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singapore and other Asian nations have been criticized for using their version of the development model to reinforce government control and public obedience (Gunaratne, 2005). Development journalism's proponents claim it does not necessarily translate to reporting on leaders, policies, and projects favorably, but rather on giving priority to development news, such as helping the public see solutions to development problems, or even critically examining development policies and projects (Kelly & Ramaprasad, 2003;Rampal, 1984). Reviewing twentieth-century Asian journalism, Richstad (2000) pointed out that development journalism does not necessarily mean government control of media, but rather, constructive co-operation of government and media.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The western interpretation was that journalism of this type was an attempt by authoritarian governments to provide only a positive picture of the country and particularly of its leaders and their development efforts (Sussman, 1981) so as to continue to remain in power. The developing world's perspective was that the media had an important role in aiding the government's development efforts (Rampal, 1984;Aggarwala, 1977), and could do this critically.…”
Section: Media and National Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramaprasad and Kelly (2003) suggested a list of functions for possible use in journalist surveys in developing countries; they included roles that represent both the western and developing world perspective on development news roles. According to proponents of development journalism, mostly Third World governments and some of its journalists, development journalism does not equal positive coverage and protocol news but objective and prioritized coverage of development policy and programs (Rampal, 1984). Critics mostly from the developed world insist that development journalism is a euphemism for government control of the media to project a positive image and hide government corruption (Sussman, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%