Abstract:The flurry of publications devoted to the functions of long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) published in the last decade leaves no doubt about the exceptional importance of lncRNAs in various areas including tumor biology. However, contribution of lncRNAs to the early stages of oncogenesis remains poorly understood. In this study we explored a new role for lncRNAs: stimulation of specific chromosomal rearrangements upon DNA damage. We demonstrated that lncRNA CASTL1 (ENSG00000269945) stimulates the formation of the … Show more
“…The presence of specific transcripts [e.g. lncRNAs that share homology regions for two different loci ( 12 , 13 )] or certain drugs ( 14 ) can also affect the formation of chromosomal rearrangements. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions to prevent the occurrence of translocations and the development of related diseases such as cancer.…”
Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.
“…The presence of specific transcripts [e.g. lncRNAs that share homology regions for two different loci ( 12 , 13 )] or certain drugs ( 14 ) can also affect the formation of chromosomal rearrangements. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions to prevent the occurrence of translocations and the development of related diseases such as cancer.…”
Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.
“…In this issue of the International Journal of Cancer, Demin et al 1 describe a long noncoding RNA CASTL (chromosomal aberrations stimulating lncRNA) that facilitates CCDC6-RET fusion (inv(10)(q11; q21)). Expression of CASTL1 is cell-type specific and can account for the appearance of CCDC6-RET fusion only in specific cell types.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.