2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial Examples for Malware Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
411
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(438 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
411
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach was also adopted in [11]. Furthermore, as discussed in [11], malware data contains stricter semantics in comparison to image data.…”
Section: Datasets and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar approach was also adopted in [11]. Furthermore, as discussed in [11], malware data contains stricter semantics in comparison to image data.…”
Section: Datasets and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach was also adopted in [11]. Furthermore, as discussed in [11], malware data contains stricter semantics in comparison to image data. In our case, each feature of a malware sample indicates whether or not a potential bit of malware has initiated a certain le system access.…”
Section: Datasets and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also used in computer security applications such as malware detection. One of the challenges in developing such models are intelligent adversaries who are actively trying to evade them by perturbing the trained model (Grosse, Papernot, Manoharan, Backes, & McDaniel, ).…”
Section: Adversarial Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example arise in the context of software classification, where the objective of the adversary is to force the machine learning algorithm to misclassify a malicious software (malware) as a benign one, for example [20], [21], [22]. In that context, there has been several works that provide involved approaches for such a task.…”
Section: Understanding the Space Of Robust Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%