2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10125-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial example detection for DNN models: a review and experimental comparison

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robustness of computer vision CNNs against AEs is well studied in the literature [12], and many countermeasures [15,16,21,22,23], i.e. defenses and detectors, were implemented to characterize the feature space of the AEs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness of computer vision CNNs against AEs is well studied in the literature [12], and many countermeasures [15,16,21,22,23], i.e. defenses and detectors, were implemented to characterize the feature space of the AEs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explainability (e.g., saliency maps from Grad-CAM) might be a useful indicator for determining adversarial attacks. The saliency maps of adversarial images are expected to differ from those of clean images [41,42]. However, explainabilitybased defenses might be limited since Grad-CAM could be easily deceived [43]; specifically, adversaries could adjust DNN models to allow Grad-CAM to yield their desired saliency maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further downstream tasks and user/analyst acceptance (trust) are therefore improved when receiving well-calibrated posterior confidence scores. We further desire not to give highly confident predictions at test/inference time to "unwanted" examples, such as out-of-domain/out-ofclass or adversarial examples, and thus extensions with Open Set Recognition [12,17] and adversarial detection techniques [2] are also of importance to include in real-world scenarios.…”
Section: Believabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%