2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial attacks and defenses in Speaker Recognition Systems: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ever-increasing variety of attacks methods against SRSs necessitates the need for an evaluation criterion. Jiahe Lana et al [4] put forward the same from three aspects: i. Practicability-evaluated by transferability, universality, attack media, distance and commercial SRSs; ii. Imperceptibilityevaluated on the basis of types of adversarial audio, perturbation norm, human perception and signalto-noise ratio; iii.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ever-increasing variety of attacks methods against SRSs necessitates the need for an evaluation criterion. Jiahe Lana et al [4] put forward the same from three aspects: i. Practicability-evaluated by transferability, universality, attack media, distance and commercial SRSs; ii. Imperceptibilityevaluated on the basis of types of adversarial audio, perturbation norm, human perception and signalto-noise ratio; iii.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the improvement in computer performance and data processing capacity, deep neural networks have demonstrated great advantages in intelligent environments such as image and speech recognition [1], autonomous driving [2], natural language processing [3,4], and network security detection [5]. However, recent studies have shown that deep neural networks are vulnerable to AEs [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%