2023
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05452-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial and variational autoencoders improve metagenomic binning

Pau Piera Líndez,
Joachim Johansen,
Svetlana Kutuzova
et al.

Abstract: Assembly of reads from metagenomic samples is a hard problem, often resulting in highly fragmented genome assemblies. Metagenomic binning allows us to reconstruct genomes by re-grouping the sequences by their organism of origin, thus representing a crucial processing step when exploring the biological diversity of metagenomic samples. Here we present Adversarial Autoencoders for Metagenomics Binning (AAMB), an ensemble deep learning approach that integrates sequence co-abundances and tetranucleotide frequencie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contigs longer than 1 kb were selected for metagenomic binning. We utilized multiple toolkits to recover high-quality MAGs, each sample assembly or co-assembly was binned using a combination of several tools including BASALT (via MetaBAT2 v2.12.1, MaxBin2 v.2.2.4, and CONCOCT v1.1.0 with more-sensitivity parameter) 37 – 40 , metaWRAP (via MetaBAT2 v2.12.1 and CONCOCT v1.1.0) 41 , MetaBinner v1.4.4 42 , MetaCoAG v1.1 43 , SemiBin v1.5.1 (single_easy_bin,–self-supervised) 44 , Vamb v4.1.0 45 and MetaDecoder v1.0.18 46 with default parameters. The resulting bins were then pre-assessed and quality-filtered using MDMcleaner v0.8.7 47 , retaining only bins with completeness ≥50% and contamination ≤10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contigs longer than 1 kb were selected for metagenomic binning. We utilized multiple toolkits to recover high-quality MAGs, each sample assembly or co-assembly was binned using a combination of several tools including BASALT (via MetaBAT2 v2.12.1, MaxBin2 v.2.2.4, and CONCOCT v1.1.0 with more-sensitivity parameter) 37 – 40 , metaWRAP (via MetaBAT2 v2.12.1 and CONCOCT v1.1.0) 41 , MetaBinner v1.4.4 42 , MetaCoAG v1.1 43 , SemiBin v1.5.1 (single_easy_bin,–self-supervised) 44 , Vamb v4.1.0 45 and MetaDecoder v1.0.18 46 with default parameters. The resulting bins were then pre-assessed and quality-filtered using MDMcleaner v0.8.7 47 , retaining only bins with completeness ≥50% and contamination ≤10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the metagenomic assemblies obtained for each metagenome were de novo binned separately using MetaBAT2 v2.2.15 (Kang et al, 2019), AVAMB v4.0.0.DEV (Líndez et al, 2023), MetaCoAg v1.1.1 (Mallawaarachchi and Lin, 2022), SemiBin2 v1.5.1 in self-supervised mode (Pan et al, 2023), MetaDecoder v1.0.17 (Liu et al, 2022), and CONCOCT v1.1.0 (Alneberg et al, 2014). All binning processes were executed with default parameters and 139,808 as the initial seed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k -means, k -medoids and DBSCAN) [ 57–65 ], traditional machine learning techniques (label propagation and Gaussian mixture models) [ 19 , 66–68 ] and deep learning techniques (variational autoencoders [ 69 , 70 ], Siamese neural networks [ 71 , 72 ]. adversarial autoencoders [ 73 ] and feed-forward neural networks [ 74 ]) to bin sequences.…”
Section: Features Used In Metagenomic Binningmentioning
confidence: 99%