“…Provided they take a de-moralized, culturally and nationally emancipated, and comparative stance, histories may, of course, take diff erent approaches: as discourse analyses, as (new) cultural history, as gender history, as post-colonial history, as visuality, or as (new) materiality in history (Dussel, 2012;Polenghi & Bandini, 2016;Priem & te Heesen, 2016;Herman & Roberts, 2017;McLeod, in press). In many senses, these approaches are brought together in new curriculum history (Popkewitz, Franklin, & Pereyra, 2001;Baker, 2009;Depaepe, 2012;Popkewitz, 2015;Lesko, in press), with the curriculum understood as a culturally pre-defi ned melting pot between dominant social and moral ideals and institutions, confi guring in each case particular educational practices and materialities (Tröhler, 2016b) that all deserve to be examined historically and to be told.…”