2018
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adventitious and Normal Lung Sounds in the General Population: Comparison of Standardized and Spontaneous Breathing

Abstract: The mode of breathing had an impact on both adventitious and normal lung sounds. Although adventitious sounds were found with similar frequency between the modes of breathing, less than half of these subjects were identified with both methods. Spontaneous breathing was not inferior to standardized breathing in reflecting lung disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For clarity, the study flowchart is depicted in Figure 3 . Representative spectrograms of the signals acquired via the Gili device (visual representations of frequency spectra as varied with time [ 26 ]) are depicted in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clarity, the study flowchart is depicted in Figure 3 . Representative spectrograms of the signals acquired via the Gili device (visual representations of frequency spectra as varied with time [ 26 ]) are depicted in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it would have been interesting to include additional recordings that better reflect individual lung lobes. Secondly, airflow was not standardized during the recording, while airflow and lung volume have a considerable impact on the generation of normal breath sounds as well as adventitious respiratory sounds [ 10 , 26 ]. It was decided to perform the recordings during spontaneous tidal breathing, as this approach is the most feasible in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%