Leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter in plant growth monitoring. For several decades, vegetation indices-based empirical method has been widely-accepted in LAI retrieval. A growing number of spectral indices have been proposed to tailor LAI estimations, however, saturation effect has long been an obstacle. In this paper, we classify the selected 14 vegetation indices into five groups according to their characteristics. In this study, we proposed a new index for LAI retrieval-transformed triangular vegetation index (TTVI), which replaces NIR and red bands of triangular vegetation index (TVI) into NIR and red-edge bands. All fifteen indices were calculated and analyzed with both hyperspectral and multispectral data. Best-fit models and k-fold cross-validation were conducted. The results showed that TTVI performed the best predictive power of LAI for both hyperspectral and multispectral data, and mitigated the saturation effect. The R 2 and RMSE values were 0.60, 1.12; 0.59, 1.15, respectively. Besides, TTVI showed high estimation accuracy for sparse (LAI < 4) and dense canopies (LAI > 4). Our study provided the value of the Red-edge bands of the Sentinel-2 satellite sensors in crop LAI retrieval, and demonstrated that the new index TTVI is applicable to inverse LAI for both low-to-moderate and moderate-to-high vegetation cover.LAI remote sensing retrieval methods have been widely investigated for several decades. During the past years, researchers have conducted studies on different vegetation types like broadleaf forest, coniferous forest and crop including soybean, maize and winter wheat [4][5][6]. LAI values vary with different vegetation types for different phenology. According to previous studies, LAI retrieval methods can be classified into three groups: (1) Physical methods like radiative transfer model (RTM), PROSPECT, SAIL models which study the physical mechanisms between light and vegetation to describe the light transmission on inner leaf [7,8] or canopy level [9,10]; (2) vegetation indices-based empirical methods, which engage on the relationships between spectral reflectance data and biophysical or biochemical parameters using statistical models [11][12][13][14][15]; and (3) the new research frontiers like machine learning methods, including artificial neural network and support vector machine to map LAI on large scales [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Among these approaches, vegetation indices-based empirical model has been widely used because of its simplicity and computational efficiency.Crop canopy reflectance is dependent both on biophysical parameters like LAI and biochemical parameters like chlorophyll content [23]. To avoid influence from interfering factors including external factors like atmospheric effect, soil background and intrinsic factors like leaf pigment content, leaf inclination angle, saturation effect, and other structural parameters, substantial efforts were conducted in improving classical VIs and developing new indices. Therefore, indices for different purposes were created. A...