2002
DOI: 10.2144/02334mt04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages of mRNA Amplification for Microarray Analysis

Abstract: Expanding applications of cDNA microarrays such as fine needle aspiration biopsy and laser capture microdissection necessitate the ability to perform arrays with minute starting amounts of RNA. While methods for amplifying RNA have been advocated, the fidelity of array results using amplified material has not been fully validated. Here we demonstrate preserved fidelity in arrays using one or two rounds of mRNA amplification, validated by downstream real-time quantitative PCR. In addition, the quality of the ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
99
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
99
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One round of in vitro transcription amplified Ϸ2 g of mRNA into 30-60 g of amplified mRNA. This method of ''linear'' mRNA amplification maintains the fidelity of the original mRNA species isolated from the tumor samples (8). The amplified tumor and normal mRNA were reverse-transcribed, incorporating a Cy3 (green)-labeled thymidine into the newly formed DNA molecule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One round of in vitro transcription amplified Ϸ2 g of mRNA into 30-60 g of amplified mRNA. This method of ''linear'' mRNA amplification maintains the fidelity of the original mRNA species isolated from the tumor samples (8). The amplified tumor and normal mRNA were reverse-transcribed, incorporating a Cy3 (green)-labeled thymidine into the newly formed DNA molecule.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although preliminary results were encouraging, relatively large sample volumes (Ϸ10 liters) and long sample collecting times were required. Linear RNA amplification methods have been widely used to study gene expression in eukaryotic tissues (17,18) but are not generally applicable to bacterial and archaeal mRNA because of the requirement of a poly(A) tail. Wendisch et al (19) developed a method for the polyadenylation of bacterial messenger RNA using Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase, which facilitates preferential isolation of bacterial mRNA from rRNA in crude extracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, however, RNA expression may vary drastically based on tissue structure and sampling size, so extra care should be taken to avoid biasing analyses due to sampling location. Furthermore, the nature of RNA suggests that dynamic changes in expression levels may occur, so extra care should also be taken to ensure proper kinetics are followed to study genes and pathways of interest 19,20 ; processing should be limited following extraction from RNA-stabilizing solution to ensure stability. Accordingly, storage of complementary DNA (cDNA) of increased stability is preferred to RNA (if in line with DNA analysis may be carried out on previously snap-frozen tissue samples, or on FFPE tissue sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%