Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15231-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages of deep learning with convolutional neural network in detecting disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint in magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: This study investigated the usefulness of deep learning-based automatic detection of anterior disc displacement (ADD) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). Sagittal MRI images of 2520 TMJs were collected from 861 men and 399 women (average age 37.33 ± 18.83 years). A deep learning algorithm with a convolutional neural network was developed. Data augmentation and the Adam optimizer were applied to reduce the risk of overfitting the deep-learning model. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the high sensitivity and specificity mean that the proposed model could accurately distinguish the TMD patients and non-TMD patients. We could also compare the results with existing TMD-related research [28], [29], [34]. We could find the ANN model could achieve the accuracy rate of 92.31%, which was much higher than the CNN model [28] and XGBoost+LightGBM [29] with the accuracy rates of 76.92% and 82.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the high sensitivity and specificity mean that the proposed model could accurately distinguish the TMD patients and non-TMD patients. We could also compare the results with existing TMD-related research [28], [29], [34]. We could find the ANN model could achieve the accuracy rate of 92.31%, which was much higher than the CNN model [28] and XGBoost+LightGBM [29] with the accuracy rates of 76.92% and 82.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We could also compare the results with existing TMD-related research [28], [29], [34]. We could find the ANN model could achieve the accuracy rate of 92.31%, which was much higher than the CNN model [28] and XGBoost+LightGBM [29] with the accuracy rates of 76.92% and 82.3%, respectively. The ANN also had lower expense as the variables in the input were easily to be obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations