2017
DOI: 10.1177/2050157917725550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages and challenges in using mobile apps for field experiments: A systematic review and a case study

Abstract: As smartphone’s computing power continues to grow and as mobile applications (apps) continue to dominate digital engagement, apps have become a new frontier for advancing field experiment methodology. Using apps may help researchers to scale up the reach, precisely control randomization and experiment materials, collect a variety of objective and self-reported data over time, and more conveniently replicate and adapt an experiment. We performed a systematic review on field experiments involving apps published … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Lifestyle modification programs have consistently evolved with emerging digital and communication technologies [ 8 - 13 ]. In the past two decades, there has been a large number of published studies using internet and mobile-based behavior interventions to support the effectiveness of using digital technologies to deliver intervention materials to diverse populations [ 8 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lifestyle modification programs have consistently evolved with emerging digital and communication technologies [ 8 - 13 ]. In the past two decades, there has been a large number of published studies using internet and mobile-based behavior interventions to support the effectiveness of using digital technologies to deliver intervention materials to diverse populations [ 8 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guide this study effectively, we derived explicit criteria from our previous work (Chib & Lin, 2018;Chib et al, 2015) on mHealth reviews. In order to avoid bias and error, the selected material was checked by a second co-author, similar to methods applied by Zhang, Calabrese et al (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In “Advantages and Challenges in Using Mobile Apps for Field Experiments: A Systematic Review and a Case Study,” Jingwen Zhang and colleagues (2018) perform a systematic review of 101 articles involving field experiments that use mobile apps. In their analysis they found that most of these experiments only used the apps to administer treatment materials, rather than collect data directly from respondents.…”
Section: Article Summariesmentioning
confidence: 99%