2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: Theory, research, and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in examining typically used leadership development interventions, Boak and Crabbe (2019) found that mature managers considered standardised interventions such as mentoring, appraisal feedback and temporary work assignments to have low efficacy. This widely reported low efficacy can arguably be attributed to leadership development interventions rarely being based on theoretical models of leadership development and instead being based on individual competency-, or leadership “type” models (Day et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in examining typically used leadership development interventions, Boak and Crabbe (2019) found that mature managers considered standardised interventions such as mentoring, appraisal feedback and temporary work assignments to have low efficacy. This widely reported low efficacy can arguably be attributed to leadership development interventions rarely being based on theoretical models of leadership development and instead being based on individual competency-, or leadership “type” models (Day et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person-centred perspective of leadership dominates the extant theory on leadership development (Day et al. , 2021) and is concerned with cognitive abilities (Groves and Feyerherm, 2021), personality profiles (Lee et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both definitions, people working in concert to achieve goals are centrally located. However, most leadership education research is focused on examining individual attributes and behaviors, not relationships or processes within groups designed for goal achievement (Day et al., 2021). For example, very little attention to date has been focused on examining how participating in leadership development programs in higher education builds the capacity for teams to (a) communicate better, (b) more effectively address conflict, or (c) collaborate more efficiently in achieving tasks.…”
Section: Summarizing What We Know We Do Not Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How can we be certain that what we know about student leadership development is actually true? Many scholars have recently noted the improbability of proving causal connections between participation in leadership development initiatives and subsequent growth in leadership capacity or competency (Day et al., 2021; Martin et al., 2021). This perhaps becomes even more problematic with student leadership development initiatives, as a student's interconnected web of curricular and co‐curricular participation imposes numerous confounding variables in proving positive associations to specific leadership outcomes, let alone proving causality.…”
Section: Summarizing What We Know We Do Not Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, leadership development aims to better understand, anticipate, and intervene in how people and groups build leadership potential. These concerns have piqued the interest of academics interested in the elements and processes that influence the development of leaders and leadership (Day et al, 2021). "There is a large debate among theorists on how leadership should be perceived.…”
Section: Literature Review On Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%