2003
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2003.11777194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing the Scholarship of Teaching through Collaborative Self-Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the collaborative context, research partners can ask questions, offer alternative explanations, and critically evaluate research more easily than can an individual researcher (Louie, Drevdahl, Purdy, & Stackman, 2003). Membership of a research team or dyad influences a person's academic identity.…”
Section: Learning Partnership and Shared Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the collaborative context, research partners can ask questions, offer alternative explanations, and critically evaluate research more easily than can an individual researcher (Louie, Drevdahl, Purdy, & Stackman, 2003). Membership of a research team or dyad influences a person's academic identity.…”
Section: Learning Partnership and Shared Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In collaborative self-study, collaboration is seen as a critical element (Bodone, Guonjonsdottir, & Dalmau, 2004). Collaborative self-study can give each of the participants the advantage of multiple perspectives, thereby creating a broader context for interpretation of each one's beliefs and practices (Louie et al, 2003).…”
Section: Collaborative Self-studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, educators have recommended that schools create structures and policies that would organize school faculty members around collaborative action research groups -e.g., professional learning communities -in order to ensure that these practical activities take place and support the continued development of teachers (DuFour, Eaker, and DuFour 2005). However, with the exception of a handful of reports of collaborative activities (e.g., Cochran-Smith 2003;Mewborn et al 2002), it is difficult to locate descriptions of teacher educators who have adopted these recommendations for themselves (Greenwood 2007;Louie, Drevdahl, Purdy, and Stackman 2003). Nevertheless, collaborative inquiry activities may serve as important professional development activities for teacher educators (Cochran-Smith 2003;.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 92%
“…His call to divide intellectual functions among discovery, integration, application, and teaching emphasized recognition of the varying strengths and talents of individual faculty. Since that time, affirmation of the need to redefine scholarship has come from numerous sources (Braxton, Luckey, & Helland, 2002;Brown, 1997;Cunsolo et al, 1996;Daly, 1994;Diamond, 1994Diamond, , 2002Hathaway, 1996;Kreber & Cranton, 2000;Louie, Drevdahl, Purdy, & Stackman, 2003;Pope, 1996;Shaker & Heilman, 2004). As an indication of the level of interest sparked by Boyer's work, The Faculty Roles and Rewards Conference, sponsored by the American Association for Higher Education has devoted a significant amount of time annually to consideration of this issue (Braxton et al, 2002).…”
Section: Redefining Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 96%