2013
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2013.800469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing social inclusion in the neighbourhood for people with an intellectual disability: an exploration of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants' definition of community broadly aligned with how community is often described in the literature; as an ecological concept incorporating the interactions between people and their built, natural, social, and economic environments [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' definition of community broadly aligned with how community is often described in the literature; as an ecological concept incorporating the interactions between people and their built, natural, social, and economic environments [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social inclusion has been a central concept within the field of intellectual disability for the last 30 years, but an upsurge of published literature suggests that scholars are reassessing the concept's value in the twenty-first century (Amado et al 2013;Bigby 2012;Cobigo et al 2012;Duggan and Linehan 2013;Hall 2009;Overmars-Marx et al 2014;Clifford Simplican et al 2015). For example, Clifford Simplican et al (2015) argue that definitional disputes around social inclusion lead to methodological disagreements over how to measure inclusion, reveal philosophical differences in the purposes behind inclusion, and prompt some scholars to search for clearer concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The literature is, however, replete with conclusions that despite increased community presence, several decades of policies have not achieved community participation for adults with intellectual disabilities, irrespective of the particular definition that is adopted (Amado, Stancliffe, McCarron, & McCallion, 2013;Bigby & Fyffe, 2010;Gray et al, 2014;Overmars-Marx et al, 2014;Walker, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%