2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing simulation tools specific to floating solar photovoltaic systems – Comparative analysis of field-measured and simulated energy performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Manoj et al. use three different simulation tools to calculate the daily energy outputs, specific energy outputs, capacity utilization factor, and performance ratio (PR$PR$) of the floating PV power station and use error measurement to verify the applicability of the simulation tools to the feasibility of the floating PV power station [4]. PR$PR$ can reflect the comprehensive operation status of the power station, so many studies have applied PR$PR$ in the aspects of fault detection and performance evaluation of PV power stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manoj et al. use three different simulation tools to calculate the daily energy outputs, specific energy outputs, capacity utilization factor, and performance ratio (PR$PR$) of the floating PV power station and use error measurement to verify the applicability of the simulation tools to the feasibility of the floating PV power station [4]. PR$PR$ can reflect the comprehensive operation status of the power station, so many studies have applied PR$PR$ in the aspects of fault detection and performance evaluation of PV power stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, most installers and researchers continue to utilize simulation tools designed for traditional PV installations, which ignore the various degradation modes accelerated by elevated temperature and humidity. The performance feasibility examination in PVsyst, SAM, Helioscope, PVsol, PV Watts calculator and Matlab Simulink as well as the verification investigation with measured data, revealed that these simulation tools might not be appropriate for WSPV simulation [11]. As this energy generation technique is still in its infancy, it requires detailed research and development in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Manoj Kumar et al. compared simulation results from three software (PVSyst®, SAM and Helioscope) with real measured data of a 2 MW FPV plant and reported the electricity generation deviation ranging from 18.4 to 38.6% [ 24 ]. Overall, the available PV simulation tools are mainly conceived for conventional land-PV installation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%