Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement

Abstract

The 2015 Paris Agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change aims to keep global average temperature increases well below 2 °C of preindustrial levels in the Year 2100. Vital to its success is achieving a decrease in the abundance of atmospheric methane (CH4), the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas. If this reduction is to be achieved, individual nations must make and meet reduction goals in their nationally determined contributions, with regular and independently verifiable global stock taking. Targets for the Paris Agreement have been set, and now the capability must follow to determine whether CH4 reductions are actually occurring. At present, however, there are significant limitations in the ability of scientists to quantify CH4 emissions accurately at global and national scales and to diagnose what mechanisms have altered trends in atmospheric mole fractions in the past decades. For example, in 2007, mole fractions suddenly started rising globally after a decade of almost no growth. More than a decade later, scientists are still debating the mechanisms behind this increase. This study reviews the main approaches and limitations in our current capability to diagnose the drivers of changes in atmospheric CH4 and, crucially, proposes ways to improve this capability in the coming decade. Recommendations include the following: (i) improvements to process‐based models of the main sectors of CH4 emissions—proposed developments call for the expansion of tropical wetland flux measurements, bridging remote sensing products for improved measurement of wetland area and dynamics, expanding measurements of fossil fuel emissions at the facility and regional levels, expanding country‐specific data on the composition of waste sent to landfill and the types of wastewater treatment systems implemented, characterizing and representing temporal profiles of crop growing seasons, implementing parameters related to ruminant emissions such as animal feed, and improving the detection of small fires associated with agriculture and deforestation; (ii) improvements to measurements of CH4 mole fraction and its isotopic variations—developments include greater vertical profiling at background sites, expanding networks of dense urban measurements with a greater focus on relatively poor countries, improving the precision of isotopic ratio measurements of 13CH4, CH3D, 14CH4, and clumped isotopes, creating isotopic reference materials for international‐scale development, and expanding spatial and temporal characterization of isotopic source signatures; and (iii) improvements to inverse modeling systems to derive emissions from atmospheric measurements—advances are proposed in the areas of hydroxyl radical quantification, in systematic uncertainty quantification through validation of chemical transport models, in the use of source tracers for estimating sector‐level emissions, and in the development of time and space resolved national inventories. These and other recommendations are proposed for...

How Much Human-Caused Global Warming Should We Expect with Business-As-Usual (BAU) Climate Policies? A Semi-Empirical Assessment

“…Therefore, CH 4 was included as one of the six greenhouse gases considered under the 1996 Kyoto protocol [18]. Indeed, as Ganesan et al (2019) [134] note, attempting to reduce anthropogenic CH 4 emissions is one of the main goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement [19]. However, during the 1990s and early 2000s, the rise in CH 4 concentrations began to slow down and even plateaued for several years.…”

Ideas and perspectives: A strategic assessment of methane and nitrous oxide measurements in the marine environment

“…These (Tian et al, 2020). Coordinating with global initiatives such as the Global Carbon Project and identifying other areas of synergistic CH 4 and N 2 O research of mutual benefit to oceanographers and scientists studying other biomes serve to strengthen the scientific achievements of all involved (Ganesan et al, 2019). Furthermore, as highlighted in Section 6, field observations alone are insufficient to improve the robustness of Earth System models and leveraging laboratory-based microbial process studies is highly recommended.…”

Quantifying sources of Brazil's CH<sub>4</sub> emissions between 2010 and 2018 from satellite data

“…Monteil et al 2011;Schaefer et al 2016;Schwietzke et al 2016;Nisbet et al 2016;Rigby et al 2017;Worden et al 2017;McNorton et al 2018;Turner et al 2019;Nisbet et al 2019). Quantifying the CH 4 budget and understanding how major sources and sinks have evolved is key to designing emission pathways that limit global warming due to the importance of CH 4 in meeting global climate targets (Ganesan et al, 2019;Nisbet et al, 2019Nisbet et al, , 2020.…”

“…To assess whether these self-determined targets are being met, independent estimates can be derived using "top-down" strategies that use atmospheric measurements to quantify sector-level emissions estimates at near real-time and at high-resolution (e.g. Ganesan et al, 2019). Using both top-down and bottom-up methods together for national-scale greenhouse gas estimation is considered to be best practice (Calvo Buendia et al, 2019) and allows for the greatest process-level understanding of changes in the atmosphere.…”