2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-015-9383-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing research on comparative and international education in Asia: contribution of the Asia Pacific Education Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were obtained in a great many studies analyzing the articles in journals or dissertations in such different fields as business management and education. According to the mentioned findings, there is an increase in the number of qualitative studies worldwide, whereas quantitative methods are used to a great extent in researches and articles conducted in Turkey, where the number of qualitative or mixed studies are very limited (Balcı, 1990;Saban et al, 2010;Balcı and Apaydın, 2009;Karadağ, 2010;Turan, et al 2014;Aydın, Erdağ and Sarıer, 2010;Göktaş et al, 2012;Uysal, 2013;Koyuncu, 2015;Örücü and Şimşek, 2011;Fazlıoğulları, 2012;Gok and Weidman, 2014). This situation could be interpreted as the fact that positivism is adopted by academics as the dominating scientific paradigm and the quantitative research method is mostly used as a reflection of this situation (Örücü and Şimşek, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings were obtained in a great many studies analyzing the articles in journals or dissertations in such different fields as business management and education. According to the mentioned findings, there is an increase in the number of qualitative studies worldwide, whereas quantitative methods are used to a great extent in researches and articles conducted in Turkey, where the number of qualitative or mixed studies are very limited (Balcı, 1990;Saban et al, 2010;Balcı and Apaydın, 2009;Karadağ, 2010;Turan, et al 2014;Aydın, Erdağ and Sarıer, 2010;Göktaş et al, 2012;Uysal, 2013;Koyuncu, 2015;Örücü and Şimşek, 2011;Fazlıoğulları, 2012;Gok and Weidman, 2014). This situation could be interpreted as the fact that positivism is adopted by academics as the dominating scientific paradigm and the quantitative research method is mostly used as a reflection of this situation (Örücü and Şimşek, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%