2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing our understanding of sibling supervision and injury risk for young children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is plausible that not locking medicines away increases poisoning risk more among boys than girls, as boys may receive less active supervision than girls 35–37. It is also plausible that not storing household products out of reach increases poisoning risk more among single adult households, where supervision may be more challenging or involve more frequent sibling supervision 38 39…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is plausible that not locking medicines away increases poisoning risk more among boys than girls, as boys may receive less active supervision than girls 35–37. It is also plausible that not storing household products out of reach increases poisoning risk more among single adult households, where supervision may be more challenging or involve more frequent sibling supervision 38 39…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home confinement reduced the opportunities for physical activity among children, particularly for children living in small apartments in urban areas, which ultimately reduced the risk of fractures [ 6 , 7 ]. 2.During the epidemic, the children stayed with their parents all day; parental supervision of children was strengthened, which could prevent children from injury in time [ 8 ]. 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance beam task developed by Morrongiello and Matheis (2007) successfully measured children’s physical risk-taking but was limited to a single task and targeted toward an older age group. Contrived hazard rooms offer unrealistic simulations and are most often conducted with parental supervision (Boles et al, 2005; Morrongiello & Dawber, 1998; Morrongiello, Schell, & Keleher, 2013; Schwebel et al, 2006). The Activity Room offers opportunity for observation of physical risk-taking in an ecologically valid setting across multiple behavior choices and actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third strategy to assess children’s risk-taking uses contrived hazards, in which researchers deliberately create apparent hazards in a monitored setting (e.g., dulled scissors, a non-functioning coffee pot, and a short stepladder) and then observe children’s interactions with the hazards (e.g., Morrongiello & Dawber, 1998; Morrongiello, Schell, & Keleher, 2013; Schwebel et al, 2006). Morrongiello and Dawber (1998) successfully adopted this design with children as young as 2 years old, discretely videotaping children’s behavior in a modified waiting room and then coding the videotapes to record aspects of child behavior and parental supervision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%