2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11852-011-0152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing objectives-based, integrated ocean management through marine spatial planning: current and future directions on the Scotian Shelf off Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract: The national legislative and policy context for integrated ocean management in Canada is provided by the Oceans Act (1996) and the supporting policy statement, Canada's Oceans Strategy. Under the Oceans Act, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is the lead federal authority for ocean affairs and is charged with leading and facilitating the development and implementation of integrated management plans for all marine waters. Integrated management efforts in Canada are being undertaken through an area-based approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants called for lessons to balance top-down and bottomup interactions between authorities and local actor groups. Insights into these combined arrangements have been provided by scholars, practitioners and program evaluators for Canada (Office of the Auditor General, 2005; Hall et al, 2011;Flannery and Cinnéide, 2012). Participants acknowledged that the current model of 'business as usual' is not working and that decisionmakers have not sufficiently prioritized nor provided sufficient resources to aid progress with ICM.…”
Section: Opportunities For Improved Icm In the Bay Of Fundymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants called for lessons to balance top-down and bottomup interactions between authorities and local actor groups. Insights into these combined arrangements have been provided by scholars, practitioners and program evaluators for Canada (Office of the Auditor General, 2005; Hall et al, 2011;Flannery and Cinnéide, 2012). Participants acknowledged that the current model of 'business as usual' is not working and that decisionmakers have not sufficiently prioritized nor provided sufficient resources to aid progress with ICM.…”
Section: Opportunities For Improved Icm In the Bay Of Fundymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, more appropriate engagement could be achieved through the creation of a provincial policy or engagement strategy (in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick) to recognize a spectrum of options through guidance and tools such as scenario planning or development (Glaser and Glaeser, 2014). Furthermore, stakeholder mapping and analysis can help understand the capacity and influence of actor groups and ensure participation mechanisms are appropriate for the scale, context and actor group (Hall et al, 2011;Cvitanovic et al, 2016;Smith et al, 2017). Local actors play a role in determining how they should be involved (Buanes et al, 2005;Flannery and Cinnéide, 2012).…”
Section: A Spectrum Of Approaches Will Support Meaningful Engagement In Icmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El ordenamiento ecológico en el marco de la planeación espacial marina tiene sustento en los principios de planeación participativa y desarrollo sostenible (DOF, 2021;Plasman, 2008;Shaefer & Barale 2011;Ko & Chang, 2012). La planeación espacial marina busca distribuir las actividades sectoriales en el tiempo y el espacio marino de manera óptima (Ardron et al, 2008;Maes, 2008;Ehler et al, 2009;Hall et al, 2011;Shaefer & Barale, 2011;White et al, 2012). Idealmente, constituye una síntesis neutral y objetiva de los intereses y necesidades sectoriales para conciliar conflictos ambientales (Douvere et al, 2007;Gutiérrez-Mariscal et al, 2008;Kenchington & Day, 2011;Boyes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Bases Técnicas Del Ordenamiento Ecológicounclassified
“…En este sentido, se debe enfatizar que el aspecto de conservar la conectividad, manifestado en los criterios de regulación analizados, sea en realidad operativo. De tal forma, se esperaría que las recomendaciones de mayor escala espacial favorecerán la conectividad (Hall et al, 2011) entre ANP regionales, resaltarán la conservación de los servicios ambientales de estos sistemas costeros y, si bien darán mayor importancia a las especies nativas regionales, no excluirán a las migratorias, independientemente de si están o no enlistadas en alguna categoría de riesgo. Estas condiciones no se cumplen actualmente en los ordenamientos analizados y ante ello, es necesario mejorarlos.…”
Section: Estrategia "A"unclassified