2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing motion denoising of multiband resting-state functional connectivity fMRI data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we leverage clean runs as an approximation of a within-subject ground truth. This approach avoids an important confound in between-subject approaches to probing artifacts: certain populations, e.g., neuropsychiatric populations, may move more on average and also have true neural differences with respect to other populations (Williams et al, 2022). The between-subject approach risks assuming all fMRI changes in high- motion individuals are artifactual and can therefore miss true neural differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we leverage clean runs as an approximation of a within-subject ground truth. This approach avoids an important confound in between-subject approaches to probing artifacts: certain populations, e.g., neuropsychiatric populations, may move more on average and also have true neural differences with respect to other populations (Williams et al, 2022). The between-subject approach risks assuming all fMRI changes in high- motion individuals are artifactual and can therefore miss true neural differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects tend to be immediate and short-lasting, and scale with the degree of head displacement (Satterthwaite et al, 2013). Head motion can also bias functional connectivity results because certain populations tend to exhibit higher head motion than healthy individuals, including older individuals and those with severe psychopathology (Huijbers et al, 2017; Martin et al, 2018; Power et al, 2020; Williams et al, 2022). As such, head motion must be effectively managed to minimize artifacts that can confound individual- and group-level results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volumes acquired during periods of excess participant motion were removed using volume censoring. Volume censoring (Power et al, 2012; Power et al, 2014; Power et al, 2015; Smyser et al, 2011; Williams et al, 2022) was performed using study-wide thresholds for participant motion, measured by low-pass-filtered framewise displacement (LPF-FD), and run-wise thresholds for whole-brain signal fluctuation, using generalized extreme value low-pass filtered temporal derivative root-mean-squared over voxels (GEV-DV) thresholding, as has been described in detail elsewhere (Williams et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Censoring thresholds were determined using resting-state data available for participants with usable TL MGN and LGN fROIs using the Multiband Censoring Optimization Tool (Williams et al, 2022) (https://github.com/CNaP-Lab/MCOT/), resulting in an LPF-FD threshold ( ΦF ) of 0.07587 mm and GEV-DV parameter ( dG ) of 3.105 (arbitrary units).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuisance parameters included six motion parameters, their squares, derivatives, and squared derivatives, as well as spike regressors to remove high motion volumes, without being convolved with the HRF. Spike regressors were identified using run-adaptive, generalized extreme value, low-pass filtered DVARS (GEV-DV) thresholds and chosen to identify approximately 3% of total volumes across each dataset 18 . The GEV-DV parameters used for each dataset were 28 in NYSPI-GE, 21 in SBU-Siemens, and 42 in HCP-Siemens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%