Advancing collaboration in Health Professions Education in the General Practice domain, developing a national research agenda

Abstract

Background Health professions education (HPE) research in the general practice domain (GP-HPE) is vital for high-quality healthcare. Collaboration among GP-HPE researchers is crucial but challenging. Formulating a research agenda, involving stakeholders, and fostering inter-institutional collaboration can address these challenges and connect educational research and practice.Methods We used Q-methodology to explore participants' perspectives from all Dutch postgraduate GP training institutes on GP-HPE research. Participants individually sorted statements based on the relevance of future GP-HPE research for educational practice. Data analysis comprised inverted factor analysis, rotation, and interpretation. The National Meeting on Educational Research took a participatory approach that was crucial in decision-making and aligning the results.Results We included 73 participants with diverse involvement in GP-HPE research. We identified five distinct perspectives, each representing a research focus area for developing and innovating GP education: the clinician scientist, the socially engaged GP, the specific GP identity, the GP as an entrepreneur, and the GP engaged in lifelong learning.Discussion The resulting five perspectives align with the general practice hallmarks. Q-methodology and a participatory approach facilitated collaboration and consensus among stakeholders. Successful inter-institutional collaboration requires a common goal, neutral leadership, participant commitment, regular meetings, audit trail support, process transparency, and reflexivity. Future research should focus on addressing evidence gaps within these perspectives.Conclusion In the Netherlands, we developed a national research agenda for GP-HPE research using Q-methodology, focusing on inter-institutional collaboration, which provides a potential model for HPE researchers worldwide.