2021
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors9050099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Wearable Chemosensors

Abstract: In this review, the latest research on wearable chemosensors is presented. In focus are the results from open literature, mainly from the last three years. The progress in wearable chemosensors is presented with attention drawn to the measuring technologies, their ability to provide robust data, the manufacturing techniques, as well their autonomy and ability to produce power. However, from statistical studies, the issue of patients’ trust in these technologies has arisen. People do not trust their personal da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry, ow injection analysis, voltammetry and microbiology have been reported in detection of Fe 3+ , and these methods have disadvantages such as complex preprocessing, burdensome process, high operating costs, limited sensitivity and long analysis time. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Therefore, the above methods cannot be utilized as analytical tools for real-time or site inspection of target analytes, which greatly limits their practical application. As an alternative method, uorescence sensors possess the advantages of high sensitivity, strong selectivity, fast response, low cost, real-time analysis and good portability, hence it is of great signicance to design and prepare a simple and efficient uorescence sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry, ow injection analysis, voltammetry and microbiology have been reported in detection of Fe 3+ , and these methods have disadvantages such as complex preprocessing, burdensome process, high operating costs, limited sensitivity and long analysis time. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Therefore, the above methods cannot be utilized as analytical tools for real-time or site inspection of target analytes, which greatly limits their practical application. As an alternative method, uorescence sensors possess the advantages of high sensitivity, strong selectivity, fast response, low cost, real-time analysis and good portability, hence it is of great signicance to design and prepare a simple and efficient uorescence sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live sensing, data recording, and computing have been performed using external devices and portable systems ( Wang C. et al, 2018 ; Ershad et al, 2020 ; Hanna et al, 2020 ). Compared with the traditional medical health monitoring that relies on a typical medical infirmary, the intelligent biochemical sensors have attracted ever-increasing attentions for their flexibility, rapidity, biocompatibility, high specificity, and low cost ( Kim et al, 2019 ; Bocchetta et al, 2020 ; Koralli and Mouzakis, 2021 ). More importantly, this technology creates two-way feedback between doctors and patients to develop more personalized and scientific health care programs ( Hughes, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%