Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives (2001) 2001
DOI: 10.7449/2001/superalloys_2001_237_247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in the State-of-the-Art of Hammer Forged Alloy 718 Aerospace Components

Abstract: Computer controlled hammer (CCH) forging results in a reproducible, pre-programmed hammer blow energy and blow sequence, and a record of the actual velocity, energy and operation timing for each forged component. This new capability in hammer forging allows for sophisticated hammer forging processes executed under accurate control. At the same time, it also makes the process and microstructure modeling of hammer forging possible. In this study, hammer forging of Alloy 71 8 was performed run using a computer co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of this test method is the linear increase of the effective strain over the radius at a constant local strain rate. In order to simulate the real process parameters of screw presses [ 3 , 8 , 11 ] and forging hammers [ 5 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], the following temperatures, strain rates and two differentiated initial structures were selected and summarized in Table 2 . In order to differentiate between DRX and MDRX [ 3 , 9 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], the same forming conditions were applied to all tests where quenching was conducted either directly after forming or after 5 and 15 s holding time.…”
Section: 2 Double Cone Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of this test method is the linear increase of the effective strain over the radius at a constant local strain rate. In order to simulate the real process parameters of screw presses [ 3 , 8 , 11 ] and forging hammers [ 5 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], the following temperatures, strain rates and two differentiated initial structures were selected and summarized in Table 2 . In order to differentiate between DRX and MDRX [ 3 , 9 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], the same forming conditions were applied to all tests where quenching was conducted either directly after forming or after 5 and 15 s holding time.…”
Section: 2 Double Cone Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the production of aircraft parts from alloy 718, the material undergoes several forging steps and heat treatments [ 1 , 2 ]. In case of the forming equipment, such as screw presses and hydraulic or counterblow hammers, the difference in the energy input leads to difference in the recrystallization behavior of the material and thus leads to a variation in the microstructure of the final component [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. An optimization of the process parameters to adjust the microstructural and mechanical properties is essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloy 718 can be forged at very high strain rates (hammer forging) or very low strain rates for superplastic forming. [6,7,8] Alloy 718 has and continues to be processed by casting processes of all types and sizes to obtain mechanical properties. [5 -9] This material is readily welded to support fabrication and repair processes.…”
Section: Meeting the Challenges Of Numerous Industries And Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material models have been linked with FEM models to simulate bulk deformation and microstructure evolution in high strain-rate hammer forging of turbine engine disks. [35] These efforts were extremely successful in predicting the evolution of microstructure basis dynamic and meta-dynamic recrystallization, as well as grain growth resulting from adiabatic heating during the high strain-rate manufacturing process.…”
Section: Review Of Modeling and Simulation Applications To Alloy 718 ...mentioning
confidence: 99%