SUMMARY:SDAVFs cause hypertension and hence outflow obstruction in the perimedullary venous system resulting in swelling and edema of the cord followed by dysfunction. Clinical presentation is usually with gradual progressive paraparesis, numbness, and sphincter problems. MR imaging typically demonstrates the dilated perimedullary veins and the swelling and edema of the cord. During the past few years, we incidentally found an SDAVF on MR imaging with dilated perimedullary veins but without swelling and edema of the cord in 5 patients with unrelated presenting clinical symptoms. Spinal angiography confirmed the presence of an SDAVF in all 5 patients. Although the indication was considered questionable, eventually all 5 fistulas were endovascularly or surgically treated, resulting in normalization of the MR images.ABBREVIATION: SDAVF Ď spinal dural arteriovenous fistula S DAVFs are rare acquired vascular lesions predominantly affecting middle-aged men. The pathologic arteriovenous shunt between a radiculomedullary artery and a radicular vein is located on the dural nerve sheath and results in venous hypertension, and the outflow obstruction, in turn, causes congestion of the spinal cord with edema, swelling, and dysfunction. The clinical symptoms are a slowly progressive paraparesis with gait disturbance, numbness, and micturition and defecation problems.1-4 MR imaging typically shows a triad of dilated perimedullary veins, cord swelling, and central high signal intensities on T2-weighted images. [5][6][7] In recent years, we discovered that not all SDAVFs present with spinal cord signal abnormality and cord swelling and that SDAVFs may be encountered as incidental findings on imaging studies for unrelated symptoms. In a 10-year period from 2001 to 2011, we encountered 52 patients with SDAVFs in our hospital, and 5 of these (10%) were asymptomatic and incidentally discovered. In this article, we present these 5 cases. All patients were examined by a neurologist and a neurosurgeon and repeatedly discussed in a weekly meeting with neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neuroradiologists.
Case Reports
Case 1A 63-year-old man with nonspecific chronic low back pain was referred for MR imaging of the lumbar spine, which showed dilated perimedullary veins without swelling or signal changes of the spinal cord (Fig 1). The patient opted for conservative treatment, and follow-up MR imaging findings after 1 and 2 years were unchanged. Because the pain had become worse and the patient insisted on treatment, we finally decided to honor his request, though we found a relation between his nonspecific pain and the fistula unlikely. Spinal angiography revealed an SDAVF on the right L1 level. It was not possible to catheterize the feeding artery, and a small coil was left in the L1 lumbar artery close to the fistula to assist the neurosurgeon in localizing the fistula under fluoroscopy. The fistula was surgically disconnected. Follow-up MR imaging at 3 months and 1 year confirmed permanent disappearance of the dilated perimedullary vein...